# Pure Convection : The Rotating Hill#

**Summary:**#

*Here we will present two methods for upwinding for the simplest convection problem. We will learn about Characteristics-Galerkin and Discontinuous-Galerkin Finite Element Methods.*

Let \Omega be the unit disk centered at (0,0); consider the rotation vector field

Pure convection by \mathbf{u} is

The exact solution c(x_t,t) at time t en point x_t is given by

where x_t is the particle path in the flow starting at point x at time 0. So x_t are solutions of

The ODE are reversible and we want the solution at point x at time t ( not at point x_t) the initial point is x_{-t}, and we have

The game consists in solving the equation until T=2\pi, that is for a full revolution and to compare the final solution with the initial one; they should be equal.

**Solution by a Characteristics-Galerkin Method**#

In FreeFem++ there is an operator called `convect([u1,u2], dt, c)`

which compute c\circ X with X is the convect field defined by X(x)= x_{dt} and where x_\tau is particule path in the steady state velocity field \mathbf{u}=[u1,u2] starting at point x at time \tau=0, so x_\tau is solution of the following ODE:

When \mathbf{u} is piecewise constant; this is possible because x_\tau is then a polygonal curve which can be computed exactly and the solution exists always when \mathbf{u} is divergence free; convect returns c(x_{df})=C\circ X.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 | // Parameters real dt = 0.17; // Mesh border C(t=0., 2.*pi) {x=cos(t); y=sin(t);}; mesh Th = buildmesh(C(100)); // Fespace fespace Uh(Th, P1); Uh cold, c = exp(-10*((x-0.3)^2 +(y-0.3)^2)); Uh u1 = y, u2 = -x; // Time loop real t = 0; for (int m = 0; m < 2.*pi/dt; m++){ t += dt; cold = c; c = convect([u1, u2], -dt, cold); plot(c, cmm=" t="+t +", min="+c[].min+", max="+c[].max); } |

Info

3D plots can be done by adding the qualifyer `dim=3`

to the plot instruction.

The method is very powerful but has two limitations:

- a/ it is not conservative
- b/ it may diverge in rare cases when |\mathbf{u}| is too small due to quadrature error.

**Solution by Discontinuous-Galerkin FEM**#

Discontinuous Galerkin methods take advantage of the discontinuities of c at the edges to build upwinding. There are may formulations possible. We shall implement here the so-called dual-P_1^{DC} formulation (see Ern):

where E is the set of inner edges and E_\Gamma^- is the set of boundary edges where u\cdot n<0 (in our case there is no such edges). Finally [c] is the jump of c across an edge with the convention that c^+ refers to the value on the right of the oriented edge.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 | // Parameters real al=0.5; real dt = 0.05; // Mesh border C(t=0., 2.*pi) {x=cos(t); y=sin(t);}; mesh Th = buildmesh(C(100)); // Fespace fespace Vh(Th,P1dc); Vh w, ccold, v1 = y, v2 = -x, cc = exp(-10*((x-0.3)^2 +(y-0.3)^2)); // Macro macro n() (N.x*v1 + N.y*v2) // Macro without parameter // Problem problem Adual(cc, w) = int2d(Th)( (cc/dt+(v1*dx(cc)+v2*dy(cc)))*w ) + intalledges(Th)( (1-nTonEdge)*w*(al*abs(n)-n/2)*jump(cc) ) - int2d(Th)( ccold*w/dt ) ; // Time iterations for (real t = 0.; t < 2.*pi; t += dt){ ccold = cc; Adual; plot(cc, fill=1, cmm="t="+t+", min="+cc[].min+", max="+ cc[].max); } // Plot real [int] viso = [-0.2, -0.1, 0., 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 1., 1.1]; plot(cc, wait=1, fill=1, ps="ConvectCG.eps", viso=viso); plot(cc, wait=1, fill=1, ps="ConvectDG.eps", viso=viso); |

Note

New keywords: `intalledges`

to integrate on all edges of all triangles

(so all internal edges are see two times), nTonEdge which is one if the triangle has a boundary edge and two otherwise, `jump`

to implement [c].

Results of both methods are shown on figure 1 with identical levels for the level line; this is done with the plot-modifier viso.

Notice also the macro where the parameter \mathbf{u} is not used (but the syntax needs one) and which ends with a `//`

; it simply replaces the name `n`

by `(N.x*v1+N.y*v2)`

. As easily guessed `N.x,N.y`

is the normal to the edge.

Fig. 1: The rotated hill after one revolution with Characteristics-Galerkin | and with Discontinuous P_1 Galerkin FEM. |
---|---|

Now if you think that DG is too slow try this :

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 | // Parameters real al=0.5; real dt = 0.05; // Mesh border C(t=0., 2.*pi) {x=cos(t); y=sin(t);}; mesh Th = buildmesh(C(100)); // Fespace fespace Vh(Th,P1dc); Vh w, ccold, v1 = y, v2 = -x, cc = exp(-10*((x-0.3)^2 +(y-0.3)^2)); Vh rhs=0; // Macro macro n() (N.x*v1 + N.y*v2) // Macro without parameter // Problem real t = 0.; varf vAdual (cc, w) = int2d(Th)( (cc/dt+(v1*dx(cc)+v2*dy(cc)))*w ) + intalledges(Th)( (1-nTonEdge)*w*(al*abs(n)-n/2)*jump(cc) ) ; varf vBdual (cc, w) = - int2d(Th)( ccold*w/dt ) ; matrix AA = vAdual(Vh, Vh); matrix BB = vBdual(Vh, Vh); set (AA, init=t, solver=sparsesolver); // Time iterations for (t = 0.; t < 2.*pi; t += dt){ ccold = cc; rhs[] = BB * ccold[]; cc[] = AA^-1 * rhs[]; plot(cc, fill=1, cmm="t="+t+", min="+cc[].min+", max="+ cc[].max); } |

Notice the new keyword `set`

to specify a solver in this framework; the modifier `init`

is used to tell the solver that the matrix has not changed (`init=true`

), and the name parameter are the same that in problem definition (see Problem)

**Finite Volume Methods** can also be handled with FreeFem++ but it requires programming.#

For instance the P_0-P_1 Finite Volume Method of Dervieux *et al* associates to each P_0 function c^1 a P_0 function c^0 with constant value around each vertex q^i equal to c^1(q^i) on the cell \sigma_i made by all the medians of all triangles having q^i as vertex.

Then upwinding is done by taking left or right values at the median:

It can be programmed as :

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 | load "mat_dervieux"; //External module in C++ must be loaded // Parameters real dt = 0.025; // Mesh border a(t=0., 2.*pi){x=cos(t); y=sin(t);} mesh th = buildmesh(a(100)); // Fespace fespace Vh(th,P1); Vh vh, vold, u1=y, u2=-x; Vh v=exp(-10*((x-0.3)^2 +(y-0.3)^2)), vWall=0, rhs=0; // Problem //qf1pTlump means mass lumping is used problem FVM(v,vh) = int2d(th,qft=qf1pTlump)(v*vh/dt) - int2d(th,qft=qf1pTlump)(vold*vh/dt) + int1d(th,a)(((u1*N.x+u2*N.y)<0)*(u1*N.x+u2*N.y)*vWall*vh) + rhs[] ; matrix A; MatUpWind0(A, th, vold, [u1, u2]); // Time loop for (int t = 0; t < 2.*pi ; t += dt){ vold = v; rhs[] = A * vold[]; FVM; plot(v, wait=0); } |

the "mass lumping" parameter forces a quadrature formula with Gauss points at the vertices so as to make the mass matrix diagonal; the linear system solved by a conjugate gradient method for instance will then converge in one or two iterations.

The right hand side `rhs`

is computed by an external C++ function `MatUpWind0(...)`

which is programmed as :

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 | // Computes matrix a on a triangle for the Dervieux FVM int fvmP1P0(double q[3][2], // the 3 vertices of a triangle T double u[2], // convection velocity on T double c[3], // the P1 function on T double a[3][3],// output matrix double where[3]) // where>0 means we're on the boundary { for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) for(int j = 0; j < 3; j++) a[i][j] = 0; for(int i = 0; i < 3; i++){ int ip = (i+1)%3, ipp = (ip+1)%3; double unL = -((q[ip][1] + q[i][1] - 2*q[ipp][1])*u[0] - (q[ip][0] + q[i][0] - 2*q[ipp][0])*u[1])/6.; if (unL > 0){ a[i][i] += unL; a[ip][i] -=unL; } else{ a[i][ip] += unL; a[ip][ip] -=unL; } if (where[i] && where[ip]){ // this is a boundary edge unL = ((q[ip][1] - q[i][1])*u[0] - (q[ip][0] - q[i][0])*u[1])/2; if (unL > 0){ a[i][i] += unL; a[ip][ip] += unL; } } } return 1; } |

It must be inserted into a larger .cpp file, shown in Appendix A, which is the load module linked to FreeFem++.